Interesante, pero cuanto cuesta? MIentras la opcion en el uso de las energias renovables sea costoso no podra ser considerada una opcion economicamente viable
Interesante, pero cuanto cuesta? MIentras la opcion en el uso de las energias renovables sea costoso no podra ser considerada una opcion economicamente viable
if richard branson can send folks into space using profit as motive, surely someone can build a few of these things that actually work well without having to rely on government funding, not to sound like a tool but, Walmart could invest the capital and get into this business fairly easy I would think, or exxon, not that they owe it to anyone to do so, but imagine what it would do for their image and imagine if they coudl make it profitable
Against government spending that isn’t necessary or profitable? To WHOM? Did you find it acceptable that Halliburton’s stock price more than doubled due to the invasion of Iraq?
But a wind tower that produces megawatts of electricity without harmful radiation or carbon emissions is a problem for you.
Wow, talk about misguided. I hope you at least profited from the KBR spinoff from Halliburton. What, no money in the stock market? Another boob who kowtows to the GOP without rational thought.
uh… idk where u are getting this from. i am against all gov spending that isn’t necessary or profitable. from dems or republicans. i just want to keep my money instead of it all going to waste for something stupid. like a wind tower cough
This has not been “invented”. It goes off the basic principle of a chimney. Like the ones in the middle ages. It;s not new and no, they should not get the Nobel Prize.
PHOENIX, Oct. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — EnviroMission Limited (Pink Sheets: EVOMY – News) US power purchase negotiations to deliver the first of two, 200 MW Solar Tower power stations, have been given the green light from Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA).
Solar Tower power station developments planned for Arizona have been approved by SCPPA as suitable renewable energy projects to facilitate the goals of its members’ renewable portfolio standards (RPS).
Yeah, unlike your support for Hank Paulson’s $1.4 trillion in TARP spending with no government oversight. That was okay because he was a Bush appointee, right?
Thank you for the great post. I hope you have an amazing New Year!!. Be sure to put on your tactical body armor with all those jerks blasting their pistols into the air.
December 24th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Interesante, pero cuanto cuesta? MIentras la opcion en el uso de las energias renovables sea costoso no podra ser considerada una opcion economicamente viable
December 24th, 2009 at 9:21 am
Interesante, pero cuanto cuesta? MIentras la opcion en el uso de las energias renovables sea costoso no podra ser considerada una opcion economicamente viable
December 24th, 2009 at 10:03 am
Innovation and legislation not war.
Peace,
E-T
December 24th, 2009 at 10:43 am
maybe terrorist attraction.
December 24th, 2009 at 11:33 am
if richard branson can send folks into space using profit as motive, surely someone can build a few of these things that actually work well without having to rely on government funding, not to sound like a tool but, Walmart could invest the capital and get into this business fairly easy I would think, or exxon, not that they owe it to anyone to do so, but imagine what it would do for their image and imagine if they coudl make it profitable
December 24th, 2009 at 12:04 pm
An innovative concept
December 24th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
if someone fall down from top of it
he must die
and it burned
December 24th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
tourist attraction
December 24th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Hmm… trees under the heat ‘collectors’ Doesn’t seem very efficient. Fancy monorails and glass elevators? Not cheap or economical either.
December 24th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
what a gay video!
December 24th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Against government spending that isn’t necessary or profitable? To WHOM? Did you find it acceptable that Halliburton’s stock price more than doubled due to the invasion of Iraq?
But a wind tower that produces megawatts of electricity without harmful radiation or carbon emissions is a problem for you.
Wow, talk about misguided. I hope you at least profited from the KBR spinoff from Halliburton. What, no money in the stock market? Another boob who kowtows to the GOP without rational thought.
December 24th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
uh… idk where u are getting this from. i am against all gov spending that isn’t necessary or profitable. from dems or republicans. i just want to keep my money instead of it all going to waste for something stupid. like a wind tower cough
December 24th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
Nice in theory, but someone get the funding and the land and then try it.
December 24th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Sorry but the guy was right.
“MW per second” means power divided by seconds and it’s nonsense.
kilowatthour is power MULTIPLIED by time, aka energy.
December 24th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
This has not been “invented”. It goes off the basic principle of a chimney. Like the ones in the middle ages. It;s not new and no, they should not get the Nobel Prize.
December 24th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
1 Watt is one joule per second. 200 megawatts is 200,000,000 joules per second. It’s not megawatts per second.
December 24th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
PHOENIX, Oct. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — EnviroMission Limited (Pink Sheets: EVOMY – News) US power purchase negotiations to deliver the first of two, 200 MW Solar Tower power stations, have been given the green light from Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA).
Solar Tower power station developments planned for Arizona have been approved by SCPPA as suitable renewable energy projects to facilitate the goals of its members’ renewable portfolio standards (RPS).
December 24th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
Yeah, unlike your support for Hank Paulson’s $1.4 trillion in TARP spending with no government oversight. That was okay because he was a Bush appointee, right?
December 24th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Wrong. Amount of energy flow over time is how you pay for your electricity. Ever hear of a kilowatthour?
December 24th, 2009 at 7:19 pm
if you look at it and think penis, i think that should be a red flag for ya.
but anyways its a good idea, there is hope
December 24th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
it already exist… but not that big
December 24th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
heated air has lower density so it goes up… it can generate energy by making run a turbine on it’s way
December 24th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
i still don’t get how it can generate energy
December 24th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
I wonder how to mantein the turbines in the strong wind area, this tower cannot be shut off, it will work well at night too
December 24th, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Interesting idea.
January 1st, 2010 at 5:14 am
Thank you for the great post. I hope you have an amazing New Year!!. Be sure to put on your tactical body armor with all those jerks blasting their pistols into the air.