Quantum Mechanics: The Structure Of Atoms
Quantum Mechanics (Part 2): The Structure Of Atoms. — Subscribe to Science & Reason: • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com • www.youtube.com — 1. A Brief History Of Quantum Mechanics www.youtube.com 2. The Structure Of Atoms www.youtube.com 3. Wave Function And Wave-Particle Duality www.youtube.com 4. The Uncertainty Principle www.youtube.com 5. The Spin Of Fundamental Particles 6. Quantum Entanglement — Atomic Structure It was during the early decades of the 19th century that the structure of atoms was coming into focus. It was known for example that a hydrogen atom contained one proton and one electron. But the scientists of the time could think of no stable arrangement of the two particles. It was known that protons in any atom were grouped in a small central region called the nucleus and that the electrons were somehow arranged at comparatively large distances outside the nucleus. But, in hydrogen, if the electron were stationary, it would fall into the nucleus since the charges on the particles would cause them to attract one another. Yet the electron couldnt be in an orbit circling the nucleus either. Circular motion requires constant acceleration of the circling body to keep it from flying away. But the electron has charge and charged particles radiate light when they are accelerating. So an electron in a circular orbit would radiate light and would spiral into the nucleus. Bohr Atom Niels Bohr proposed the first working model of the hydrogen atom. In the Bohr …
July 27th, 2010 at 7:54 am
@weepaul666 Oh ok, so you mean the historians of Jesus’ time were not rational minded historians. Jesus is dependent upon faith. Jesus was a man who walked the Earth, and even visited England.
July 27th, 2010 at 8:42 am
@weepaul666
“When you see a scientist prove a theory, you have to be a dumb fuck to be against it…” What you are saying here is profoundly unscientific. One of the main contrast points between science and religion is that whereas ideas in religion are held as holy and untouchable, ideas in science are open to debate; they can be challenged and absolute certainty is not an option. The ability to question what you think you know to be true is characteristic of the scientific mind.
July 27th, 2010 at 8:42 am
@weepaul666 and when you see a regious man support a theroy of god with no proof and be against it you must b a genus
July 27th, 2010 at 8:52 am
Seriously, loved the video… Well explained… Good graphics… But your character animation and lips sync almost looks like a live action ken doll scene where the puppet masters are epileptic.
Now, dont get me wrong, I LOVED the video.
Awesome information.
Well explained.
Great graphics.
Baaaaad 3D.
If youre looking for animators, let me know.
July 27th, 2010 at 9:07 am
@ekaj777 The only thing we all are is atomic structures. That is, we are all composed of a collection of atoms created during the life and death of distant stars. The idea of god came erroneously from one of these collections of atoms at some time in our remote past and now today, amazingly, there are still collections of atoms such as yourself who can’t separate an idea from a fact no matter how much evidence you are given.
July 27th, 2010 at 9:40 am
If they were aiming for the Uncanny Valley, they landed far far short of it…
July 27th, 2010 at 9:44 am
why is there religious shit here
this has nothing to do with religion.
go away.
July 27th, 2010 at 10:12 am
I can never tell if these videos use a really good text-to-speech program or have a narrator with an odd accent.
July 27th, 2010 at 10:40 am
where does the incial engergy for everything come from?
July 27th, 2010 at 10:52 am
A true religion first of all should have signs of physical order to examine and verify its state of truth
And a true religion gives a law of world order to make man not to deviate from order but it will not stop man to think and search research in the field of order
But a wrong religion stops man’s thinking and become hurdle for its development and growth
July 27th, 2010 at 11:52 am
what I have never been able to understand is why people don’t get that science and religion (or at least…whatever “god” is) are ONE and the same. We are all one thing…collectively we are “god”…as for proving that…well I guess I just have “faith”
July 27th, 2010 at 12:47 pm
@kulyateiqbal
I mean in the way religion teaches what it thinks is the whole truth and never thinks ‘well maybe we’re wrong about this’ whereas science always asks itself ‘am I wrong?’
July 27th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
@b29349
yes u r right
July 27th, 2010 at 2:17 pm
@musicCway
who said u to not to question
world is asking about religion only
July 27th, 2010 at 3:16 pm
Religion is actually a faith in law and order
It is presented in the form of signs of law and order
But it is not presented in the form of science
Of matter and clay for a man to become materialist
July 27th, 2010 at 4:09 pm
Correct weepaul666. Except when it comes to climate change. Then the science becomes a religion.
July 27th, 2010 at 4:26 pm
this video is so fucking cool
July 27th, 2010 at 5:19 pm
@b29349
Science is not the search for patterns of matter. Science asks questions and tries to find answers whereas religion preaches answers to you and tells you not to ask questions.
July 27th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
This is a great video. Very well explained
July 27th, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Okay. Science is about discussing the concepts, right? Good. So now tell me, why do we need an animated thing…?
July 27th, 2010 at 6:07 pm
What a rediculous thing to say
July 27th, 2010 at 6:09 pm
Science is the search for patterns of matter. I believe patterns were formed by a former, matter by a creator.
July 27th, 2010 at 6:31 pm
People have been believing in a God for at least 5000 years. 400 over hundred generations, concurrently. Sciences shows miracles, miracles show God. This is not some idea that was thought of recently and promoted for completely selfish desires for ultimate power and control. Some day soon you’ll see the danger of promoting evolution. I’m not against evolution, for one it would take more faith to agree with this “theory” than religious laws.
July 27th, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Even if you saw proof, you would still not believe. Theory are still theory until they are universally accepted then they are referred to as laws.
July 27th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
@potibh
wat