Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Periodic Table Trends: Ionization Energy

Posted by: andrew99  :  Category: Energy


What an ion is. Using the periodic table to understand how difficult it is to ionize an atom.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

25 Responses to “Periodic Table Trends: Ionization Energy”

  1. joeybenn Says:

    Amazing as always! Thank you

  2. bellamyanne Says:

    Thanks! Favorited. Need to watch it a few more times before my test next week, though.

  3. denicpetar Says:

    OMG. Helooo. The CA in caion is catod and the AN in anion is anod. DUDE

  4. euch27 Says:

    Neon says “I’ve achieved happiness in life, don’t mess with my electron”–lol

  5. euch27 Says:

    You’re right, it should be called cationization – historical science can always be brushed up on (as the model of the atom changed throughout the years.)

  6. SteroidsR4success Says:

    This is an amazing video and is very intuitive. The more you watch this video, it just gets more and more intuitive each time. This video is absolutely remarkable and really is another one of those big videos that gets your mind opened up to an entire field of new concepts. Lol I know Im saying this for a third time now but I just have got to say though man that this video is absolutely amazing. Great job Sal.

  7. kmcnolo Says:

    Thank you soooo much! this was a huge help.

  8. don145arsenal Says:

    can someone plz help me. i need this for an exam in two days.

    r the s,p,d orbitals like different shells in the atom. ???

  9. amycarlettegilllxo Says:

    you’re amazing. thank you so much. omg.

  10. adeyemi1960 Says:

    tanx 4 dis lecture..am grateful

  11. Xoxocube Says:

    Ahh i see. Thanks.

  12. Poncho151500 Says:

    Lol, how I think of it is, it’s losing 2 negative charges (’cause electrons are negative) so it’s like… losing a negative, which is positive. So it becomes positive.

  13. Poncho151500 Says:

    It’s easier for them to lose one electron (so that they’ll reach a valence of 8 electrons in the previous energy level). He covers it in the video before this one.

  14. sillybillybg144 Says:

    You just saved me from failing at life
    il ove you

  15. Robeeto5 Says:

    Thanks

  16. Val224 Says:

    THANKYOU!!!!

  17. karlkarlkarl1234 Says:

    I LOVE YOU KHAN!!!!!!!!!11

  18. GabhrooShakeen09 Says:

    the energy required to remove 1 electron from 1 mole of gaseous atoms to make 1 mole of gaseous unipositive ions

  19. Xoxocube Says:

    Why do they want to give away electrons on the first group.

    I thought that that group wanted to gain electrons (to reach 8)

  20. abbeyzgray Says:

    very good.

  21. sixtingurl18 Says:

    awesome

  22. mcmugget Says:

    electrons are negatively charged bud =)

  23. theveeed Says:

    I thought of the same. But you can think of it like this… Say you have Magnesium. Magnesium has 2 valence electrons. Since it has 2 valence electrons it will want to lose 2 for it to become “stable” thus, forming an ion. It would be written as Mg 2+ Think of it like it loses 2 electrons so Magnesium has more Protons now, since it lost 2.

  24. vickiormindyb Says:

    That guy was creating new molecular structures that would become the structure of new medications.
    It would take 14 years just to complete the whole process.

  25. vickiormindyb Says:

    Why isn’t #87, Fr, an alkali?

    Those ions remind me of when I was getting Couples Therapy w/ that chemist. The therapist told us we were like 2 negative ions, b/c we couldn’t get along, that we canceled each other out.
    When we got back to the car, he burst out laughing.
    I asked him what was so funny, b/c I found her comment depressing.
    He told me negative ions don’t do what she said.
    I had no idea they didn’t. I failed high school Chemistry.
    Now I’m beginning to see why he laughed.

Leave a Reply